The American Society of Pain and Neuroscience (ASPN) Guidelines and Consensus on the Definition, Current Evidence, Clinical Use and Future Applications for Physiologic Closed-Loop Controlled Neuromodulation in Chronic Pain: A NEURON Group Project Article

Full Text via DOI: 10.2147/JPR.S475527 Web of Science: 001420804800001

Cited authors

  • Pope JE, Deer TR, Sayed D, Antony AB, Bhandal HS, Calodney AK, Chakravarthy K, Costandi S, Diep J, Durbhakula S, Fishman MA, Gilligan C, Goree JH, Guirguis M, Hagedorn JM, Hunter CW, Kallewaard JW, Kapural L, Lam CM, Li S, Mayrsohn B, Nijhuis H, Nikolic S, Petersen EA, Poree LR, Puri SK, Reece DE, Rosen SM, Russo MA, Shah JM, Staats PS, Verrills P, Vu CM, Levy RM, Mekhail N

Abstract

  • Introduction: Neuromodulation has been a staple of treatment for moderate-to-severe chronic refractory pain since the introduction of the first spinal cord stimulator by Norman Shealy in 1967. Appreciating the dynamic nature of electrical modulation of the nervous system from the epidural space, the goal has been consistent, reliable, and therapeutic neural activation of the spinal cord. This has proven to be extremely difficult. Recently, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) released a guidance on physiologic closed loop controlled (PCLC) devices, highlighting the potential for these therapies to deliver accurate, consistent, real-time therapy, enhancing medical care and reducing variability. Because of the growing neuromodulation market focus on PCLC strategies, the American Society of Pain and Neuroscience (ASPN) sought to develop guidance on safety and efficacy, along with a taxonomy surrounding PCLC systems (PCLCSs) and to develop an evidence-based best practice review. Methods: A librarian-assisted literature search was performed to identify manuscripts relevant to the topic of PCLC stimulation for management of chronic pain. Initial literature search was performed utilizing MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane database, BioMed Central, and Web of Science. Included manuscripts encompassed meta-analyses, systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials (RCTs), prospective or retrospective studies with follow-up to 12 months, limited to the English language. MESH terms utilized included "closed-loop", "physiologic closed loop controlled", "spinal cord stimulation", "closed loop feedback", "feedback controlled", "neuromodulation", "pain", "persistent pain", "neuropathic pain", and "chronic pain". The modified USPSTF evidence and recommendation grading strategy previously utilized was again employed. Results: Four studies were identified for review, 2 prospective, one retrospective, and one randomized controlled study with at least 12-month follow-up. Conclusion: PCLC neuromodulation is an innovation that requires a responsible introduction. As commercial access grows, there is a responsibility that requires consistency with definition, evidence generation, focused on safety and efficacy.

Authors

Publication date

  • 2024

Published in

International Standard Serial Number (ISSN)

  • 1178-7090

Number of pages

  • 21

Start page

  • 531

End page

  • 551

Volume

  • 18