Clinical Consensus Statement: Balloon Dilation of the Eustachian Tube Article

Full Text via DOI: 10.1177/0194599819848423 PMID: 31161864 Web of Science: 000473507100002

Cited authors

  • Tucci, Debara L.; McCoul, Edward D.; Rosenfeld, Richard M.; Tunkel, David E.; Batra, Pete S.; Chandrasekhar, Sujana S.; Cordes, Susan R.; Eshraghi, Adrien A.; Kaylie, David; Lal, Devyani; Lee, Jivianne; Setzen, Michael; Sindwani, Raj; Syms, Charles A., III; Bishop, Charles; Poe, Dennis S.; Corrigan, Maureen; Lambie, Erin


  • Objective To develop a clinical consensus statement on the use of balloon dilation of the eustachian tube (BDET). Methods An expert panel of otolaryngologists was assembled with nominated representatives of general otolaryngology and relevant subspecialty societies. The target population was adults 18 years or older who are candidates for BDET because of obstructive eustachian tube dysfunction (OETD) in 1 or both ears for 3 months or longer that significantly affects quality of life or functional health status. A modified Delphi method was used to distill expert opinion into clinical statements that met a standardized definition of consensus. Results After 3 iterative Delphi method surveys, 28 statements met the predefined criteria for consensus, while 28 statements did not. The clinical statements were grouped into 3 categories for the purposes of presentation and discussion: (1) patient criteria, (2) perioperative considerations, and (3) outcomes. Conclusion This panel reached consensus on several statements that clarify diagnosis and perioperative management of OETD. Lack of consensus on other statements likely reflects knowledge gaps regarding the role of BDET in managing OETD. Expert panel consensus may provide helpful information for the otolaryngologist considering the use of BDET for the management of patients with OETD.

Publication date

  • 2019

International Standard Serial Number (ISSN)

  • 0194-5998

Start page

  • 6

End page

  • 17


  • 161


  • 1